The New York Times racism in distracting the general public about crimes committed in DR Congo

In reporting on an issue however serious it is as recurrent serial rapes in Kivu provinces of DR Congo, but in a manner intentionally unprofessional, I accuse The New York Times of being racist. I assume the intention of the journalist in his writing is not to inform but to create an image or reference purposely negative about a particular community – Hutus, this in the mind of his readers. At the same time by not focusing on the story which would normally be the main news for his publication, he distracts the same readers from the seriousness of crimes committed in DR Congo by Paul Kagame’s forces on defenseless Hutus women, elderly and children who were either Rwandan refugees or Congolese citizens. Through his action he also manages therefore to cover up the Rwandan leader criminal responsibility.

At the time when the serial raping is reported it is only three days after the UN report accusing Paul Kagame’s forces and others involved in DR Congo between 1993 and 2003 came out. It is on October 3rd, weeks after the leaking of the initial draft on August 26th and a month of postponement for the publication of the final report. While the rest of the general public interested in what have been recurring insecurity and tragedies which wiped out almost 8 millions of lives in the Great Lakes region of Africa, and tired of persistent impunity of wide scale criminals, is focused on the enormity of crimes that the UN report documents, it is surprising not to see an influential paper like the New York Times some seemingly support to get some justice for the victims by holding all perpetrators accountable for their acts. But Milton Allimadi in Black Star News explains the reasons which may be behind such attitude.

A few months ago I wrote an article talking about the racist stand in reporting about events occurring in the Great Lakes region. I invite you to revisit it below. People and vested interests behind the racist drive in mainstream media either for personal conviction or material gains should be ashamed of themselves. African lives are as human as theirs.

International community racism in dealing with issues related to Rwanda and DR Congo

Countries of the whole Great Lakes region of Africa, but mainly and in a particular way, Rwanda and DR Congo, have been the theater of ongoing suffering of populations and million lives wasted, for almost two decades. The pursuit widely documented of strategic minerals by multinationals has continuously fuelled these tragedies.

Parties to the misery of citizens of the region have in many respects portrayed racist attitudes. Michael Fairbanks, in his article in The Huffington Post dated May 3, 2010 Nothing Good Comes out of Africa defines what being racist means, ‘It can mean the subtle, pernicious accumulation of unconscious prejudices against those who see the world differently.’

The Oxford encyclopedia goes along similar lines when it explains that racists believe, ‘that there is a causal link between inherited physical traits and traits of personality, intellect, morality, and other cultural behavioral features, and that some “races” are innately superior to others.’

Some apparent indifference

This is not about Fairbanks’ piece of writing neither a clarification about racism but only a reference to help shade some light on a dark and cynically cover-up of contemporary African history. Racism characteristics in the prevailing situation of DR Congo and Rwanda have been well overlooked for many years.

On 23/4/10 in Brussels, during a demonstration requesting immediate release from a Rwandan prison of  Victoire Ingabire Umuhoza, the leader of the United Democratic Forces-Inkingi, Joseph Matata, stressed how ashamed the international community should be at the nearly 8 million lives that ongoing and aftermath tragedies in the two countries have taken away unduly. The question he highlighted was whether such apathy towards the misery of their populations was due to the color of their skin.

The indifference, – no I would rather say deep involvement, which fails to notice value in African humanity being wasted day and night for so long, exceeds what I would’ve  expected from the West. It somewhat explains the value the latter puts in its material pursuits. DR Congo has plenty of raw minerals which provide essential components in many global industries led by Western multinationals.

The past embedded in the present

As for the exploitation of the precious resources, strategies King Leopold II used after the acquisition of Congo as a private property have slightly changed since 1885. Indigenous people died in millions, starved to death, from diseases, being forced to get required quota of rubber vines, or rebelling against forced labor.

Areas of DR Congo that mining companies with international ramifications are currently interested in have an acute presence of rebellion groups. UN reports have in recent years recorded an average of twenty five such movements. Among these there is FDLR – Forces Democratiques de Liberation du Rwanda, that the Rwandan government has linked Victoire Ingabire Umuhoza to in its accusations against her.

Weighing up the accusations as fabrications aimed at rather destroying Victoire and her party political ambitions, than searching for any truth there, the important side of the story is how such allegations enable to maintain the status quo for illegal exploitation of DR Congo resources, continuous abuse of human rights and systematic repression of populations in Rwanda.

For many years, the international community namely and mainly US and Britain have been turning a blind eye on the attitude of Paul Kagame’s regime despite its totalitarian rule against its people and involvement in DR Congo. It’s like masters looking away when their agent is working abusively the labor force to get profits they are fiercely after.

Lessons from elsewhere

In the Balkans, when in the early 1990s ex-Yougoslavia and other countries of this European region disintegrated further to the fall of Communism, the whole West uses its forces and resources: military, economic and judiciary, to stop tribal like social unrests taking over. Maybe it was because this was happening very closely to home, with risks of contagion.

Another explanation could be remembrance of past conflicts, not far away in the region which started there and engulfed the whole world with damages and consequences that are today not fully extinct from the collective memory of humanity.

It surprises to observe that what worked in the Balkans, or other places like Northern Ireland, South Africa, or Burundi to solve continuous and social tensions cannot be applied to DRC and Rwanda situations, particularly by bringing around a table antagonist parties in the latter country.

During King Leopold II rule over the Congo (today DR Congo), estimates from scholars such as Jan Vansina suggest that local populations halved further to causes already highlighted. In the last twenty years, ill-conquest of political power of current Rwandan leader, Paul Kagame, combined with the greed and insatiable pursuit of minerals of DR Congo by local and multinational stakeholders have resulted in the killing and oppression of millions.

A Congolese friend told me months ago, ‘with the international crisis deepening, expect more involvement of capitalist interests than before in our region; otherwise where do you think they will get buffers to fill their enormous national deficits.’ I am convinced they could rebalance their books without resorting to unconditionally support their local agents in DR Congo and Rwanda who are enslaving their people, while the ultimate beneficiaries do the covering up.

Advertisements

One response to “The New York Times racism in distracting the general public about crimes committed in DR Congo

  1. Pingback: Simplistic racist views of African conflicts | Rising Continent

What is your opinion about this?

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s